| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 517 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. (MSEDCL) vs BIFR and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 404531]
|
AAIFR (Delhi) |
2010 |
Hardcastle Waud Mfg. Co. Ltd. vs OL
Lease of land to company with an option to renew-Possession of property taken over by OL-The applicant had given its land on lease to the respondent under a registered lease deed for a period of 25 years, with an option to the respondent t [LexDoc Id : 402176]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2010 |
OL of India Electronics Ltd. (In Liquidation) vs Ravi Kumar Jain
Winding up: Statement of affairs to be made to OL-Cessation from directorship before winding up order passed-The OL had filed an application for taking cognizance of offence under s.454(5) and s.454(5A) of the Companies Act 1956 against the respondents and to [LexDoc Id : 402615]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2010 |
Anil Kumar Poddar vs Pilani Investment and Industries Corpn. Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 413313]
|
CLB |
2010 |
J.K. Udaipur Udyog Ltd. vs BIFR and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 403355]
|
AAIFR (Delhi) |
2010 |
State Bank of India vs OL, H.K. Datarex (P) Ltd. (In Liquidation)
Winding up: Denial of claim filed on basis of recovery certificate-Non-compliance of mandatory requirement of s.529A, Impugned order set aside, Matter remanded for reconsideration-The applicant was a secured creditor of the company in liquidation. It had initiated proceedings against the company before the DRT for recovery of ce [LexDoc Id : 398459]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2010 |
Manjit Jaju vs ROC of N.C.T. of Delhi and Haryana
False statement in prospectus: Limitation for filing complaint-Limitation a mixed question of law and facts-The offence under s.63 of the Companies Act 1956 stood committed when prospectus containing untrue statement was issued and offence under s.468 of the [LexDoc Id : 393663]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Co. Ltd. vs Mehar Karan Singh
[LexDoc Id : 393518]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2010 |
RBI vs CFL Capital Financial Services Ltd. and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 403538]
|
CLB |
2010 |
Terryfab India Ltd. vs BIFR and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 404527]
|
AAIFR (Delhi) |
2010 |
OL of Shree Vaishnavi Printers (P) Ltd. (In Liquidation) vs A.R. Govindaraj
Power of court to assess damages against delinquent directors-Claims becoming time barred on account of latches and lapses on part of directors-The respondent directors of the company in liquidation had filed their statement of affairs and produced the balance sheet on the basis of which the O [LexDoc Id : 402177]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2010 |
Jagatjit Jaiswal and Anr. vs Karamjit Singh Jaswal and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 393549]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Ramesh Tiwari and Anr. vs Pantaloon Retail India Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 400853]
|
CLB |
2010 |
Vilas Baliram Sawant vs Mayuri Y. Shah and State of Maharashtra
[LexDoc Id : 393716]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2010 |
Jugal Kishore Arora vs Ajit Balaji Joshi and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 433510]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2010 |
Bijay Kumar Kajaria and Ors. vs Murat Viniyog Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 403541]
|
CLB |
2010 |
Highseas Mastics India (P) Ltd. vs ROC
Restoration of name of company-Name struck off due to default in statutory compliances-The respondent had struck the petitioner-company’s name off the Register due to defaults in statutory compliances namely failure to file balance sheet [LexDoc Id : 397351]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Price Waterhouse and Co., Sharmila Karve, Lovelock and Lewes, Dalal and Shah, Vivek Prasad, Partha Ghosh, Lalit Punjabi, Thomas Mathew, Kersi Vachha, Kumar Dasgupta, Venkat Raman Srinivasan, Bipin Pawar, Anuradha Tuli and Ors. vs SEBI and Ors.
Investigation and inquiry by SEBI-Aspects of power to give directions, jurisdiction-The question whether any of the petitioners with an intention and knowledge tried to fabricate and fudge the books of accounts of the company was a ma [LexDoc Id : 394216]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2010 |
Yogendra Singh, Aminder Kaur and Ors. vs Ranbir Sharma and Anr.
Offence by company: Liability of directors-Managing director the person in-charge of and responsible to company for conduct of its business and could be prosecuted for any offence committed by company without authorisation-The Food Inspector had filed a complaint against the petitioners, a sugar superintendent of the mill and the managing director and remaining other dir [LexDoc Id : 408854]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2010 |
Sharad Kumar Singh and Ors. vs ROC
Offences by Company-Petition seeking direction to relieve from prosecution-The petitioners, full time employees of the company, which took over the management of the company from its promoter to protect its interest, had been [LexDoc Id : 407157]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2010 |
Adani Enterprises Ltd., In re
Scheme of arrangement in the nature of amalgamation-Scheme in the interest of shareholders and creditors-The petitioner-transferee company sought for sanction of the scheme of arrangement in the nature of amalgamation of seven transferor companies with it [LexDoc Id : 397345]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2010 |
Jwalaprasad Ramgopal Agrawal and Anr. vs Sunderpuria Steel and Roller Flour Mills (P) Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 401230]
|
CLB |
2010 |
Rashmi Cement Ltd. vs Presidency Exports and Industries Ltd.
Winding up: Inability to pay debts-Respondent neither having good defence nor raising a triable issue, Remote possibility to tender evidence, Petitioner relegated to suit subject to certain conditions-The petitioner had filed a winding up petition contending that there was short delivery of
goods even full price for the consignment was paid. The [LexDoc Id : 400134]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2010 |
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. vs J.B. Diamonds Ltd.
Winding up: Inability to pay debts-Transactions in derivatives-The petitioner had granted various facilities to the respondent to enable the respondent to hedge foreign currency exposure. Pursuant to such faciliti [LexDoc Id : 393515]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2010 |
State of Kerala vs OL of Poysha Industrial Co. Ltd.
Application of insolvency rules in winding up of insolvent companies-Overriding preferential payments-The high court dismissed the application contending that the applicant’s dues, i.e. sales tax arrears due from the company in liquidation, ranked in p [LexDoc Id : 393000]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2010 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
